<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Non-Flash Users Get No Respect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lroot.com/articles/non-flash-users-get-no-respect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lroot.com/articles/non-flash-users-get-no-respect/</link>
	<description>Development News &#38; Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:23:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://blog.lroot.com/articles/non-flash-users-get-no-respect/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 19:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lroot.com/?p=824#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Agreed flash isn&#039;t going anywhere. But I dont believe that it is a partisan issue in which you have to pick a side and remain blind to everything else. Its been possible for years to place alternate media types in place of unsupported ones based on client capabilities. Its being done all the time by folks who understand the value of adapting their content to the means of their users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed flash isn&#8217;t going anywhere. But I dont believe that it is a partisan issue in which you have to pick a side and remain blind to everything else. Its been possible for years to place alternate media types in place of unsupported ones based on client capabilities. Its being done all the time by folks who understand the value of adapting their content to the means of their users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Simmons</title>
		<link>http://blog.lroot.com/articles/non-flash-users-get-no-respect/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 06:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lroot.com/?p=824#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Jump on board or get run over, flash isn&#039;t going anywhere. You can be one of the ones who picks a side &amp; faces criticisms from the other or you can just hope for the best overall web experience with whatever framework the provider chooses to build off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jump on board or get run over, flash isn&#8217;t going anywhere. You can be one of the ones who picks a side &amp; faces criticisms from the other or you can just hope for the best overall web experience with whatever framework the provider chooses to build off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kacboy</title>
		<link>http://blog.lroot.com/articles/non-flash-users-get-no-respect/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>kacboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 05:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lroot.com/?p=824#comment-39</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true. Most sites have some part that is flash and they don&#039;t put effort in the stuff that replaces the flash if it isn&#039;t on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true. Most sites have some part that is flash and they don&#8217;t put effort in the stuff that replaces the flash if it isn&#8217;t on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

